<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<cmspage>
  <body>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;Gartner Talk - 19th May 2009, Bunga Raya Audi, MDeC&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Salient Points;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Industry Technology: OT (Operational Technology) vs IT and the Implications for Industry&lt;br /&gt;- Dan Miklovic, VP &amp;ndash; Manufaturing Service Director&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;middot; IT is only half of the problem&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;middot; The Conflict: IT- Business R/ship is a failure to communicate&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;middot; CIO Top 3 priorities 2008&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;o Deliver projects that enable biz growth&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;o Linking biz and IT strategies&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;o Attract developing and retaining IT personnel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;middot; IT&amp;rsquo;s perceived Barriers to growth&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;middot; Though ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) is essential but it is not key in a business &amp;ndash; ie: employees still come as long as they receive salary, they don&amp;rsquo;t care how it works&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;middot; Apple &amp;ndash;iPOD &amp;ndash; single most successful thing in the world today&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;middot; A company must have a good manufacturing &amp;amp; engineering tools to keep it working&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;middot; A failure to communicate on many different levels &amp;ndash; the many different languages used (The Language of IT vs The Language of OT); Purpose, Architecture, Interfaces, Ownership, Connectivity&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;middot; Technology is beginning to converge&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;middot; Different Technologies &amp;ndash; Value comes from Integration&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;middot; The conflict is not just in utilities but may have some other names &amp;ndash; &amp;ldquo;OT&amp;rdquo; separation and resistance to convergence with IT is a by-product of the engineering culture in organizations &amp;ndash; and a rational reaction to IT shortfalls&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Eg: Cabbies in Australia need not be in the country for a long time to know roads/streets there, all they need to do is insert the addresses given by passengers and key it in the NAP ??system&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;middot; To cater younger generation &amp;ndash; you gotta know technology&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;middot; To mix manufacturing and engineering ppl is to &amp;lsquo;force&amp;rsquo; them together &amp;ndash; mash &amp;lsquo;em together like doing salad dressing&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;middot; OT is using Open Platforms and Networks&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;middot; Increased need for asset monitoring&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;middot; Reduce cost&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;middot; &amp;ldquo;IT agility is about supporting business agility, this makes it necessary for the OT and IT approaches to converge&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;middot; We need technologies that can take real time issues ie: green issues, economic drought&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;middot; Everything &amp;lsquo;out&amp;rsquo; there is Smart. Everything will have some kind of smart intelligence embed into it eg: RFID. Hotels beginning to use it. To tag their equipment, chairs&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;middot; Question is: How do we use this information effectively?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;middot; Why now: Sensor Networks = Developed for scientific applications and research technology exists, but not mainstream until 2012&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;middot; Why now: The need for Asset Monitoring = Still in the labs &amp;ndash; not widely supported until 2010&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;o Location Services&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;o Location Data&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;o Auto Location Sensing&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Future Scenarios&lt;br /&gt;&amp;middot; Scenario 1: The rise of CIO &amp;ndash; CIO becomes COO&lt;br /&gt;&amp;middot; Scenario 2: The rise of CTO&lt;br /&gt;&amp;middot; Other possible scenarios &amp;ndash; Walls between IT &amp;amp; OT, The Demise of CIO, Anarchy (every man for themselves &amp;ndash; its whether if you&amp;rsquo;re the hunter or the prey&lt;br /&gt;o The Demise of CIO - Why do we need CIO if we already have cloud computing etc., google things&lt;br /&gt;o Anarchy &amp;ndash; dangerous to move alone, analogy: in the wild, lion and impala. Lion will only capture one impala, other impala survived coz they run in a pack &amp;ndash; its only a matter of who got caught by the &amp;lsquo;lion&amp;rsquo;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;middot; Reports from the Front Line (Testimonials)&lt;br /&gt;o SCADA&lt;br /&gt;o Oracle &amp;amp; Microsoft (saving money in both parties on licenses)&lt;br /&gt;&amp;middot; SCADA on a shared network?&lt;br /&gt;o Proceed with caution&lt;br /&gt;o Conflict with operational packets&lt;br /&gt;o Hardware software need testing&lt;br /&gt;&amp;middot; MDeC should or can be seen as &amp;lsquo;mustard&amp;rsquo; in the salad dressing in mixing the 2 sectors (IT &amp;amp; OT) together.&lt;/p&gt;</body>
  <created-at type="datetime">2009-05-19T17:37:30+08:00</created-at>
  <id type="integer">22</id>
  <position type="integer">19</position>
  <profile-id type="integer">12</profile-id>
  <title>Industry Technology: OT (Operational Technology) vs IT and the Implications for Industry </title>
  <updated-at type="datetime">2009-06-17T13:23:50+08:00</updated-at>
</cmspage>
